As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from amazon.com

Listed below are the Home Republicans who backed laws defending contraception entry



Eight Home Republicans on Thursday voted for a invoice that will shield entry to contraceptives, practically a month after Supreme Courtroom Justice Clarence Thomas mentioned the bench ought to reverse a precedent safeguarding entry to types of contraception.

The Home authorised the laws, dubbed the Proper to Contraception Act, in a 228-195 vote, with all Democrats supporting the measure. Two Republicans voted current, and 6 didn’t vote.

The eight Republicans who backed the measure had been Reps. Liz Cheney (Wyo.), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Anthony Gonzalez (Ohio), John Katko (N.Y.), Adam Kinzinger (Unwell.), Nancy Mace (S.C.), Maria Elvira Salazar (Fla.) and Fred Upton (Mich.).

GOP Reps. Bob Gibbs (Ohio) and Mike Kelly (Pa.) voted current.

Gonzalez, Katko, Kinzinger, Upton and Gibbs are all not working for reelection this yr.

It’s unclear if the invoice will appeal to sufficient Republican help within the Senate to cross.

Susan B. Anthony Professional-Life America, an anti-abortion group, mentioned it was scoring towards the invoice, arguing that it might “trample on freedoms of conscience for well being care suppliers,” and labeling its definiton of contraceptives as “overbroad.”

The laws requires codifying entry to contraceptives on the federal stage — which might allow people to obtain and use contraception, and permit well being care suppliers to provide such merchandise to sufferers. It additionally authorizes the legal professional common, well being care suppliers and others to take civil motion towards states which might be in breach of the invoice.

The laws protects all kinds of contraceptives, together with oral and emergency drugs, intrauterine units and condoms.

Home passage comes practically one month after the Supreme Courtroom issued a ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 determination that protected entry to abortion as a constitutional proper. In a concurring opinion, Thomas mentioned the bench ought to “rethink” all substantive due course of precedents, together with Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 ruling that protects the proper of married {couples} to make use of contraceptives.

The bulk opinion, nevertheless, mentioned, “Nothing on this opinion must be understood to solid doubt on precedents that don’t concern abortion.”

Mace wrote on Twitter that she supported the contraceptives invoice as a result of South Carolina, her residence state, is contemplating an abortion invoice that doesn’t embody exceptions for rape and incest. A state Home panel on Tuesday mentioned it is not going to advocate the exceptions in its draft abortion laws.

“My state is banning nearly all exceptions for ladies together with rape & incest victims. At this time I voted to guard entry to contraceptives – to guard each girl in South Carolina. You may’t ban abortion after which not shield girls’s entry to contraceptives,” Mace mentioned.

Within the Capitol on Thursday, the congresswoman wore a blazer that had items of duct tape with the phrases “My State is Banning EXCEPTIONS. Defend CONTRACEPTION” written on them secured to the again.

She instructed reporters forward of the vote that “when you’ve been a sufferer of rape, it is best to have entry to emergency contraceptive.”

A spokesperson for Gibbs instructed The Hill that the congressman “wasn’t going to play Democrats’ BS video games attempting to create faux outrage.”

The spokesperson additionally claimed that Democrats “don’t need options or bipartisanship, they need the marketing campaign difficulty” as a result of they opted for their very own invoice over a Republican-sponsored measure that will permit oral contraceptives authorised by the Meals and Drug Administration to be acquired over-the-counter.



We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Dealssoreal
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
0
Shopping cart